Monday, April 24, 2017

Holocaust and Genocide I: Yom Ha Shoah and All that

Yours Truly at Auschwitz, 2006
Today (April 24) is Yom ha Shoah, or Holocaust Remembrance Day, certainly not an anniversary I’ll ever be allowed to forget (I was born in 1941). And we became aware of it early: I was too young to be conscious of it during World War itself, but we used to go to a Jewish resort/summer camp in upstate New York, and in the years right after the war ended, we used to see   Nobody knew what PTSD was then, but these folks certainly had it, and it freaked us kids out.  Nobody could have gone through Concentration, let alone Death Camps, and gotten out unscathed.  I was very glad that practically all of my family had emigrated to America before the first World War!
war refugee people with numbers on their arms and vacant wandering around the grounds from time to time.

I don’t really know if postwar-to-millennial generations feel or care about this horror, but I can say one thing about Jews, with an earlier history of being marginalized hot-wired into us, and because Judaism, whether religious or secular, makes us continually ruminate about and question things, the horrific memory still lives, although increasingly few of us were alive back then, and my guess is that the country of Israel, justifiable or not, would never have happened at all, except after the senseless sacrifice of millions.
 
Anselm Kiefer, Eisen Stadt (1986)
Maybe part of the reason that we can talk about it so freely is because in the post-war years, Germans have come forward and admitted their role—all you have to do is look at the paintings and installations of Anselm Kiefer, not Jewish and born in 1945.  Or I can recall with affection a conversation I had early one morning on a Norwegian boat, with a young fellow from Germany also traveling—about the holocaust and the human condition.  We can move on, and given the several genocides that have occurred since, or horrible die-offs before (such as the Stalin-induced great famine, or Ukrainian Holodomor of the early 1930’s, where so many millions died—and even more millions at the same time in other parts of the USSR), such slaughter seems to be one of the downsides of the human race.

Border Street: Poster
But maybe it was the cynical systematic bureaucratization with which the Holocaust was carried out during Hitler’s 12-year Reich that is the reason that so many films, plays, and documentaries have been made of it, beginning with the U.S. Army footage when the concentration   By the late 1940’s fictionalized films were begun to be made too, such as the Polish Border Street, which may have included Sovietized polemics, but which certainly must have stirred the memories of those who had lived through—Jewish or not.
camps were liberated.

Since then, there have been so many Holocaust movies that they have become the fodder of academic scholarship. How can you present, within a film or even a miniseries, an event of such magnitude? Sometimes they are fictional, as in the case of the TV Miniseries Holocaust, in which various members of the Weiss family manage to have died at each major atrocity site, be it Babi Yar or Auschwitz. Over the years, movies have run the gamut from the epic of Spielberg’s Schindler’s List, to the completely claustrophobic film of the stage play The Grey zone, dealing with the fiendish existence of the Jewish sonderkommandoes, working at the extermination centers.  A movie can manage to be romantic and dewy in spite of the ghastliness, as in the 1950’s somewhat sanitized incarnation of the Diary of Anne Frank, to the soap opera of the Holocaust miniseries, even with the macabre black humor of Europa- Europa and the macabre goofiness of Life is Beautiful, not to mention trivializing it, as in Inglorious Basterds..  There are even films about Holocaust denial. There are, of course sober, longwinded and thorough documentary films like Shoah—all nine hours of it.  In other words, something for everyone who needs to confront the topic. I could go on, but the best thing is to read one of the critical overviews mentioned at the end of this rant.
Meryl Streep in Holocaust


Some of these visual essays are about real people’s experiences, others have more dramatically invented Everyman/woman, and every time historians and military archeologists make new discoveries, they almost immediately become documentaries that soon appear on the Smithsonian (the discovery of remains at Treblinka), and Military History channels (most recently a multi-part series on the history of Auschwitz, and another really chilling one that h gave us several days of Einsatzgruppen, followed by an episode of NOVA on PBS just last week about similar activity around Vilnius (then called Vilna).  As a matter of fact, I think that the Military channel is beginning to morph into the Everything Hitler Channel. 

We can look forward and move on, which most of us have done.  There was closure in admission of guilt.  But it all seems to be a testament to the unavoidable human trait that results in flaring up of collective madness at different times and places in the world, when normal, ordinary people rise up against a selected portion of their own, for whatever reasons—evil mad, irrational “Strange Fire” that leads us to dehumanize a particular group of people for whatever reason, and slaughter them without compunction until the perpetrators burn themselves out and stop and wonder why they did it.

I’ve done the Holocaust thing to the best of my ability, including a visit to Auschwitz and visiting museums dedicated to it in Israel, Hungary and several in the U.S. I’ve even taught courses in Holocaust and Genocide film at my university.  For myself, bringing the message home were most powerfully conveyed in three movies, two of them, I think, long forgotten among the sheer volume of product. 
 
Aleksander Ford: Filming Border Street
The first of these is Border Street, a 1948 Polish film directed by Aleksander Ford.  Though shot from the Sovietized polemical point of view, this film is really interesting because it portrayed events of the immediate past in the country where they filmed: Warsaw.  The rawness of the immediate catastrophic past is so evident here.  It’s in black and white, somewhat chaotic in its plot as it follows a fictional group of families, both Jewish and non-Jewish who lived around a single courtyard, but in its very lack of subtlety, has the ring of immediacy.

Escape from Sobibor:  The Escape
Second is Escape from Sobibor, a made-for-TV movie from 1987, directed by Jack Gold, starring Alan Arkin (a Jewish actor playing a Jewish resistor), and Rutger Hauer (a Dutch non-Jewish actor playing a Russian-Jewish POW and resistor).  This film was based on a true event—there have been documentaries interviewing the real survivors---and in spite of some inevitable modifications necessary to fit the conventions of a two-hour movie filmed for television and on an average budget and the fact that the actors were better-looking than their real counterparts, was amazingly effective.  It managed to convey the horror of a death camp, and even though most of the escapees perished in their attempt, it was nevertheless inspiring in its message of the endurance of the human spirit.

My third candidate is Roman Polanski’s The Pianist, based on a real Warsaw Jewish survivor, the pianist Wladyslaw Szpilman.  This film is the Holocaust in microcosm: one ordinary Jewish guy caught up in the macrocosmic event.  Adrien Brody is amazingly poignant as a talented Everyman.  But what knocks the film out of the park for me is Polanski’s direction.  Whatever you might think about Polanski on moral grounds, it’s worth remembering that he himself was a Jewish Holocaust survivor, hiding out in Krakow.  I think this movie is partially autobiographical (I wrote about this earlier, see my blog of 6/5/2015).  I recently saw it again. If I was a survivor with his talent, this would be the movie I would make: distilling the story of millions into one.
The end of the ordeal: The Pianist



Genug; 'nuf said.

_____________________________________________________________________

Three good Books on Holocaust Film:

Aaron Kerner Film and the Holocaust, Bloomsbury Academic, 2011
Annette Innsdorf, Indelible Shadows: Film and the Holocaust, (3rd edition), Cambridge University Press, 2002
Laurence Baron, Projecting the Holocaust into the Present, Rowman and Littlefield, 2005

Watching some films:

Escape from Sobibor

You can watch Pianist for a small fee at Amazon.com

For a contemporary review of Border Street (it opened in the U.S. in 1950)




Thursday, March 30, 2017

Pirates of Capri



As an art historian I was trained to treasure artistic quality, and shun the mediocre.  Readers of this blog know that I’m not much of a quality snob, and one of my favorite movies of and since childhood bears this out.

It’s the Pirates of Capri (1949), by that supreme B movie director Edgar G. Ulmer.  What? You never heard of it? Well, you’re in the majority!  I first ran into it on TV when I was about ten or eleven years old.  I had already passed through obsessions with dinosaurs and fairy princesses and was at that moment into----arrrrr---pirates.  In the early 1950’s Hollywood produced a string of pirate movies, all now forgotten, unless you’re a fan of TCM.  I saw as many as possible at Saturday 25-cent matinees, and so became acquainted with the likes of Blackbeard, Long John Silver, and lots of others.

Hayward as The Count
With “pirates” in the title, I naturally watched Ulmer’s epic when it came on 10-inch black and white TV.  It wasn’t really about pirates, but more about a popular revolt against the Bourbon Queen of Naples, Maria Carolina, or so the movie went (historically all wrong), and featured the dashing leader of the opposition, one masked avenger named “Captain Sirocco,” who occasionally raided ships but   Sirocco was actually the Count of Amalfi, a member of the Queen’s court who was seeking revenge for the murder of his brother five years previously by the evil Baron Holstein, Maria Carolina’s chief advisor.  Of course, he triumphs in his quest for justice, helping to lead the revolt, but saving the Queen, who, as a sister of Marie Antoinette sees “the people” only as a path for her to the guillotine.
only to secure arms for the fight.
 
Hayward as Captain Sirocco
There’s oodles of predictable swordplay, torture by the Baron of beautiful but loyal peasant girls to get information on the anti-regal plot, and a romance by Amalfi/Sirocco of a beautiful Spanish noblewoman to whom he was betrothed anyway.  If this sounds to you like Zorro or numerous other dual/personality superheroes, well, it’s a time-proven plotline.  I loved the movie so much as a kid that I remember once setting my alarm for 3 am so I could catch it again.

The star of this epic was Louis Hayward, an English actor who did a bunch of swordfighting roles, but often in sequels to better known action flicks, such as The Son of Monte Cristo and the Fortunes of Captain Blood, though he also did detective stuff like The Saint.  He’s very bouncy and fences nicely; Antonio Banderas would have done it better, but he wasn’t born yet when the picture was made. 

The balance of the actors were a mix of Italians and Americans, few if any of which were household names, Mariella Loti, whose film career was apparently brief, was a charming and cute love interest.  The best was the villain, Massimo Serato, who made many Italian films over a long career.  As   The only similarly satisfying villain of this type I can think of was Alan Rickman’s fiendishly witty Sheriff of Nottingham in the otherwise forgettable Kevin Kostner version of Robin Hood.
Holstein (at right) doing his worst
Holstein, he enthusiastically went over the top pursuing power, gleefully turning spiked wheels in the torture chamber, threatening all his ineffective minions with high treason, and slithering around the Queen.

What makes the picture as watchable today as any other swashbuckling story of good and evil was the stylishness of Edward G. Ulmer’s direction.  Best known as a virtual king of the “B” picture, Ulmer’s career was quite varied, from shooting pictures in Ukrainian and Yiddish in New Jersey for speakers of those languages in the 1930’s, horror films such as the Black Cat (1932) and Bluebeard (1944), to films noirs like Detour that brought him posthumous fame by French advocates of auteur theory (for an excellent analysis of his varied production, see the article by Erik Ulman given in the link below).

Pirates of Capri features really interesting noiresque traits: the cliffs and rebel’s hideout on Capri are dark and jagged, and except for the court scenes, this darkness predominates.  Quick vignettes: a silhouetted man blowing a warning conch shell, a weeping child during Holstein’s raid on Capri, the grids of the Neapolitan prison cells, and the actors who played peasants, with their furrowed faces, lumpy bodies and bad teeth, all share traits with the contemporary neo realist films of Ulmer’s Italian contemporaries such as Roberto Rosselini and Vittorio de Sica—it’s all quite different than your average Errol Flynn epic.

The history of the film is somewhat murky.  After being consigned in Hollywood to low budget pictures after an affair got him blackballed by the big studios in the 1930’s (an affair with a married woman, whom he eventually married after her divorce), he got the opportunity to film in Italy with the Italian company AFA.  Pirates was shot in both Italian and English language versions with the same cast (except for the patriot girl Annette played by different actresses). On at least the Italian   Were the two films slightly or markedly different?  We’ll probably never know, since the Italian version apparently doesn’t survive. 
Edgar G. Ulmen
version Ulmer collaborated with Giuseppe Maria Scotese, but the latter was uncredited in the English version (on the other hand, Scotese is listed as sole director on the Italian website Mymovies.it).

Ulmer’s budget was bigger than what the Americans allowed him, and he did exterior shots on site and interiors in Rome’s lavish Cinecittà.  But in the end, it’s the location shooting, with its ominous and atmospheric lighting, that distinguishes this movie from your average pirate flick. An early score by the composer Nino Rota (best known here for the first two Godfather films), also aided the moody exteriors.

The film had a longer shelf-life than you’d expect.  It was released under various titles, including The Masked Pirate in England, and on a later Videotape as Captain Sirocco.  Because of renewed critical interest, a much better print was issued on a CD 2014.

I watched the film again yesterday.  I still love it with all its flaws.  If you want to see it, it’s on Youtube.  Go Pirates (or is it rebels)?


______________________________________________________

If you want to see the movie, it's at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ZH_Fr74nc

Some critical Essays on Ulmer:

Geoffrey Mc Nab, Magic on a Shoestring in The Guardian, August 4, 2004:
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2004/aug/05/2

Erik Ulman's Critical review of Ulmer's career:
http://sensesofcinema.com/2003/great-directors/ulmer/

Philippe Gautreau: French review of DVD:
http://www.dvdfr.com/dvd/c75321-pirate-de-capri.html

Gary Morris's review of the DVD:
http://imagesjournal.com/issue10/reviews/pirates/
















Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Donald er,,, Mike Mulligan and His Steam Shovel: A Modern Tale

            

           When I was very little, one of my favorite books was Mike Mulligan and His Steam Shovel by Virginia Lee Burton.  It was published in 1939 before I was born, and has remained a children’s classic.  There’s even an animated version produced by HBO, and still popular (you can see it on YouTube), and it inspired a T Shirt. 

            The story is about Mike Mulligan, an independent contractor, and his faithful steam shovel, dubbed “Mary Ann.”  By 1939, steam shovels had been replaced by much more modern machines, and Mike was out of work.  So he left his city with his machine and set out to look elsewhere.  He finally landed in the remote town of Popperville, where the site for a new town hall was being prepared, and volunteered that he could dig the foundation in a single day: “She [Mary Ann] can dig as much as a day as a hundred men can dig in a week (but he was never really sure if this was true)!”  Though the town fathers scoffed, they took him on, with the proviso that if he couldn’t do the job in a day as he promised, he wouldn’t be paid.

            Well, of course he did, but there was one problem: they had been so busy digging that they forgot to provide a ramp so that Mary Ann could go topside again, so they were stuck in the soon-to-be basement.  A little boy provided the solution: build the town hall around them, and leave Mary Ann in the basement, to be converted into a boiler to heat the building.  And that’s what they did--and Mike stayed on as the building’s janitor.

            This synopsis is very dry--you can have fun with it, less in the animated version, but on another YouTube video, where the story is actually read, and you can see all the pictures.  There’s a lot of humor and whimsy in the story telling.

            The story came back into my mind a few days ago, but in a very different and grown-up way.  I usually find that scholarly analyses of fairy tales and kid’s books are both tedious and silly, because all sorts of things are read into them, and these are so far away from the simple joy and satisfaction that kids get out of them.  I have to admit, though, that I can see an adult interpretation that has interesting relevance to events of the last few weeks.

            Mike and his Steam Shovel are successful in what they do--better and quicker than a whole pile of electric or diesel machines or a big bunch of diggers.  But, he doesn’t quite think things through.  He makes the claim that he can do this--but he’s never quite sure that this is true.  Well, in Popperville both the quick solution and its inherent stumbling block are revealed, with the consequence that yes, Mike does what he bragged, but then gets trapped by his own hubris.

            Does this somehow sound familiar?  Will we all be reduced to being a janitor in the hole into which we’ve dug ourselves?   Stay tuned.
 _____________________________________________

The HBO cartoon version of Mike Mulligan is athttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZtXtbZn5f0

The Complete book read aloud is athttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvhN5T4XaU8 

And here's an image of the kid's t-shirt (but it's now out of print):